@Pierrot - Iāve had lots of different musicians explain diminished concepts to me, and some made more sense than others.
I think the best thing is to find as many different āviewsā or āperspectivesā as possible and this will help to build the ācomplete pictureā
the tool search from the site with ā diminishedā dont point to it ā¦ maybe a tag missing ?
very dense and interesting again ā¦ wow great sound with easy ideas ā¦ love that so much (but Tuomo applying this always so fast, i need 3 times reviewing it to understand , hopefully it is recorded )
Prior to developing my interest in Brazilian music (thanks mainly to Jovinoās totes awesome material in PG), I had never had occasion really to pay much attention to diminished chords, and then diminished scales.
You would periodically get a diminished triad in the types of more āsoulfulā and jazz flavoured rock that I dig (Steely Dan, Boz Scaggs and the Doobie Brothers have all used them), and in a funk context from the likes of the Average White Band (half and whole diminished 7ās). A quote that sticks in my mind from when I first set out teaching myself music about 4 years ago came from a no doubt well-intentioned approach, but described it as the chord āyou wouldnāt take home to meet your motherā! Not to mention the variations on the āuglyā chord theme!
But I now love the sound especially within a Bossa Nova context. It does sound slightly questioning and an āunsureā colour as a type of harmony, and can sound a little spacey and ethereal at times too, depending on the voicing. I must admit I do find if I want to soften the sound, and depending on the voice leading, I do add a whole note above one of the tones
When I have more time I am for sure going to be focusing on this! thanks for the reminders all about the location of the lessons
Yes you will notice some similarities with Jovinoās lesson, and some different perspectives too.
For me, thatās the fascinating thing about diminished theory - and jazz theory in general - that there is lots of different ways of looking at the same thing.
I always communicate to our teachers to play and demonstrate slowlyā¦ but sometimes this is easier said than done I think! At least we have the slow down controls
Thatās an interesting way to describe a diminished chord, and I must say I agree
An āah-haā moment for me was to realise that every diminished chord can function as 4 different rootless dominant b9 chords.
So for example Edim7 (E-G-Bb-Db) can function as a rootless dominant b9 chord for C7, itās tritone F#7/Gb7, and then also A7 and itās tritone Eb7. For each of those chords, the diminished chord gives us 3-5-b7-b9.
Interestingly, if we put the roots of those rootless dominant b9 chords together, we get another diminished chord (C-Eb-Gb-A) and then if we combine that diminished chord with the original diminished chord, we get the diminished scale, or ādouble diminishedā concept.
I love how Tuomo refers to it as āa spine to all harmonic movementā.
Yes I think āunsureā is a really nice way to describe the colour of diminished harmony.
And yes i agree the diminished chord is so perfectly suited to Bossa grooves and gives that āfloating sense of uncertaintyā. Often very subtle, and always very effective.
Iām working on some interesting applications of diminished harmony for the upcoming arrangement of āSomeone to watch over meā which topped our ballad poll by some way!
The A section of the tune is packed full of diminished chords:
This will probably be more up your street than mine Jamie.... check out Chick Corea's recording of the tune:
I like some of the quartal stuff he is doing, and will likely incorporate some of this into the arrangement.
In general, when I play Gershwinās work I tend to āreign it inā a little more than Chickās performance here - I often find it a challenge to be so āavant-gardeā with Gershwinās delicate harmonies.
I remember @Pierrot said he was waiting for some ācrazinessā during my performance of Embraceable You ā¦ maybe it will come out this time Pierre in āSomeone to watch over meāā¦ i will have to see where the arrangement takes me
yeah i love this description too
even not my sensation with diminished harmony ā¦ more as āchord i would like to take homeā but that dont have the same grid , and sound much less selling i admit
little trick for me : I find the shape of half whole scale very similar with the 3 groups on C G and F (Kent Hewitt point it too in his above video) they have all this little bridge of 2 black notes btw the 1 and 4 degrees ,that helps a lot remembering the scales and combining the C, G Dm triads for the thumb its cool. This shape have already been learned in the altered scales.
I admit the diminished Half whole scales which we can play on dominant chords and the diminished whole half scales on diminished chords make things a bit confusing when looking the fingering to use
so i apply this heavy method
HW to WH C HW= Db WH half tone up = E WH a major third up = G WH a fourth up = Bb a minor seventh up
I have now the half whole HW scales pretty in the hands but when i have to find the right scale to apply on some chords i refer to this HW even for dominant chords . To find the right diminished scales for instance on C7 its the C HW easy under the finger
on CĀ° its the C WH arg for me not easy to find the corresponding fingering so with the forumla above it is G HW which i have easy under the fingers. But hard to find and not helpful in live playing
Any Trick or other method that could help quickly find the WH scales when knowing the HW scales ?
Thanks for your help
ps . it may look a little messy. though i will try write more about because writing all this stuff helps me to better overview all this complicate theory
Hi Pierre - I canāt remember where I heard this, it may have been on Pianogroove or elsewhere! But yes, basically just adding the note a whole step above any of the diminished 7 tones. youād think it would sound even more dissonant, given youāre adding a half-step interval somewhere within a stack of three minor thirds over the root, but I think it sounds interesting.
Hayden will be able to explain better than me though!
Yes I think this ties nicely into the āshadow conceptā and an interesting point for discussionā¦
If we take the notes of a diminished 7th chord, letās again take Edim7:
E-G-Bb-Db
If we play that Edim7 chord in our left hand, and then in the right hand, play a note a whole step above one of those tones, we get a more complex diminished sound.
Furthermore, if we play the Edim7 chord in our left hand, and then in our right hand we build a chord by combining those 4 notes (a whole step above everything in the left hand) we then get the double diminished.
So in effect, that whole step relationship is a nice way to visualise the diminished scale and then we can use that to visualise more complex diminished voicings and/or interesting diminished melodies.
Letās apply this into a 251:
If we look at that Edim7 chord as a C7b9, letās see how we can apply this to a 251 in F Major (G-7 / C7b9 / Fmaj7)
First play G-7/G-9/G-11 for the ii-7 chord
Then for the V7 chord, play Edim7 in our left hand which functions as rootless C7b9, and in our right hand, play that diminished chord built a whole step up, or perhaps just one note from that chord, and listen to where it wants to resolve into the Imaj7 chord Fmaj7ā¦
The Gb and the Eb from gives some interesting tension and resolution points. My ears hear that Gb resolving up a half step into the 9th of Fmaj, and the Eb can go either up, or down a half step to the 7th or 6th of Fmaj.
Using this āwhole stepā or āshadow conceptā gives us an interesting way to create and resolve tension in 251s.
Thanks @anon84688975 and @Hayden Happy to be able to talk aroud this diminished harmony . It helps getting more inside . Manipulating all this in different point of view.
but i have to fix some question before . Hayden did you read my post above with this question Any Trick or other method that could help quickly find the WH scales when knowing the HW scales ?. Or did you not understand what i was trying to ask with my delightful english
Yep this discussion has opened my mind to some new ideas with diminished harmony.
For me personally Pierre, I do not look at HW and WH as 2 different things Pierre.
There is 2 ways that diminished harmony is taught, and I have actually been taught both approaches by different teachers.
The approach that I now prefer is:
There are only 3 diminished scales. The HW/WH way of thinking is an āunnecessary duplicationā making 3 scales into 6.
Each of those 3 diminished scales can be used to derive melody and harmony over 4 diminished chords, and also the 4 related dominant chords.
The key is to memorise the groups, and then you can use diminished material from a particular diminished scale over all of the harmonies in the group.
Iāve been meaning to revisit diminished theory and add more lessons on this, perhaps even remove the HW lesson as now I believe that the HW/WH approach is more of a complication than a simplification. Some musicians may disagree with this, but thatās how I currently feel.
Iāve been meaning to make some kind of lesson following this structure:
Explore and demonstrate a diminished scale run or pattern
Apply this same run/pattern to all harmonies in the group to show how the same melodic or harmonic idea can be superimposed over different harmonies.
Demonstrate the run/pattern over a jazz standard(s) in context of a 251, and also over a diminished chord.
That is the format I like to follow with PianoGroove lessons - Show(1), Explain(2), Demonstrate(3) - and I think a lesson highlighting this process would be an awesome tool to help students add diminished sounds to their playing.
Leave it with me and I will plan the lesson out and find some nice jazz standard examples that we are all familiar with.
Hi Hayden.
Iāve completed every lesson on diminished chords on the site that I can find and am on my second time through. It has made a huge difference to my approach to dominant chords in particular and I have practiced the scales to the point where I can now play them quite fluently starting on any note. I have two questions:
Iām still confused about the terminology. Is the c diminished scale
a) C Db D# E F# G A Bb C or
b) C D D# F F# G# A B C or
c) both
A and b are two different scales. Presumably they must be used under different circumstances. Iāve read through this thread and I notice that @Pierrot mentions in a post that the hw scale is used with dominant chords and the wh with diminished chords. I suppose that makes sense since the first contains a flat seventh and the second a major 7th. Can you clarify the circumstances under which one would be used rather than the other?
I like the run in thirds that you suggest for āSome Day my Prince will Come.ā But Iām tying my fingers in knots trying to work out each diminished scale in thirds. Do you know of a suggested fingering chart for diminished scales?
Aye,
George
what you play on diminished chord the WholeHalf WhWhWhWh scale so it is named the Diminished scale or Whole-half diminished scale.
The halfwhole scale hWhWhWhW on the dominant chords (ex C7b9) are sometimes named Dominant diminished scales (that may have confuse you )
on dominant chords (exC7#9b13) we can play the altered scale hWh WWWW is called Diminished Whole-Tone (because first part hW then only whole ) , Super Locrian, and Dim-Whit scale another strange names
Thanks @Pierrot The way the altered scale was explained to me was a scale derived from the subdominant (Db for C7) that is major in the upper half and minor in the lower half. Db C Bb Ab Gb E Eb Db resolving to C. But I donāt understand why both diminished scales canāt be played with a diminished chord. Both scales hit the diminished notes, with the intervening notes a half tone above or below the diminished ones. Is it something to do with the context, ie: the key of the underlying piece?
First, keep in mind that I always try, and suggest students as well, to simplify as much as possible.
I always think of the diminished scale as ONLY whole tone/ half tone, and hereās why:
Letās start with the ACTUAL diminished chord, here D dim:
Now, when we really try to hear the essence of diminished chord, there are only the following chord tones possible (works the same way as with any chord, the āextraā chord tones after the 7th (9, 11 and 13) will be added as colors, but they are not the āmainā tones):
Now, if you look at the extra chord tones of the full diminished chord, you can notice that the added tones are actually an approach notes, half step below to all of the main chord tones:
And, if you look at it this way, hereās your diminished scale!
You might think that this still could work with half/whole tone as well, but the function of a chord behind half/whole is not a true diminished, it works as a dominant chord, just as @Pierrot mentioned:
How I see the diminished chord used over a dominant, comes again together with the II V thinking; D-7 G7 becomes D diminished (so of course G7b9), so the scale I would use is
This way of thinking simplifies diminished in other situations as well, for example a tonic diminished (meaning diminished chord resolving to I), here in the key of C major:
Thanks @Tuomo. I can definitely see that the HW scale suggests a dominant in the II-V-I example, but Iām not sure why the āapproachā explanation wouldnāt work for a diminished chord if the scale is run from the top down. Wouldnāt the notes labelled as 9th, 7th 5th and b9 then be the approach notes leading into a D dim chord?
Thanks for the fingering chart. Itās funny but I can actually see the diminished scales better in thirds! Whether I can play it is another matter!